Bring a checkable record
into the underwriting file.
Examine documented history, uncertainty and the limits of the evidence relevant to a submission.
What does the record support for this particular risk?
A review shaped forInsurers & underwriters
Sources, scope
and qualifications.
A more focused
decision process.
What this looks like
in practice.
A recorded reversal, an exposure quantity and a candidate signal require different treatment. A historical count alone does not give a probability of loss.
The deliverable separates what the source says, what follows from it and what still needs to be established. Your team keeps responsibility for the final decision.
Submission evidence
The submission, the population it describes and the evidence question the underwriting file needs answered.
Historical context
The documented history of the projects and instruments in the submission, with the limits of what that history can say.
Open underwriting questions
The points to ask about, inspect or revisit before the risk is written, stated as questions rather than conclusions.
Start with the question.
One public identifier, the decision you face and the evidence you need. We will establish fit and agree the scope.
