What you bring
The earlier and later source versions, review question and relevant assumptions.
Products / Scoped reviews
Source-change review
Connect a later disclosure to the assumptions behind an earlier decision.
Fictional illustration
Source-change review
Alder Carbon Portfolio
Earlier disclosure2028
→Later disclosure2029
Review questionWhich obligation and allocation apply?
Read this example ↗The assignmentA useful review begins
A useful review begins
with a bounded question.
Decide which questions to take back to a counterparty and which parts of the assessment need updating.
Read, reconcile, explain
Identify the subjects, inspect the relevant evidence, retain qualifications and show where statements conflict or leave the question open.
What you receive
A comparison of statements, dates, quantities and qualifications, with the implications kept separate.
From the note to the next decision.
A checkable briefing
Your team can trace each substantive finding to its supporting source and understand the limits without reconstructing the research.
Specific follow-up
Questions go to the party who can settle them. Missing information is named, with the evidence needed to resolve it.
A basis for a later review
The scope and source versions establish what was known at the time. A separately agreed refresh can compare new evidence against that record.
How an engagement is agreed
Question, positions, sources, intended use, reviewer, fee and delivery date are agreed before work starts. Recurring delivery has its own scope and capacity check. These are evidence reviews; predictive ratings, valuation opinions and continuous monitoring are not offered by this description.
Method and boundaries ↗Work with Kyroq
Discuss a case ↗Start with the question.
One public identifier, the decision you face and the evidence you need. We will establish fit and agree the scope.